Personal Journey

see no evil, hear no evil, talk no evil, and do no evil

Economy is a protection of wealthy. It’s always be mysterious, otherwise it won’t work. We might sometimes need to see no market, hear no market, talk no market and do no market. It’s true, market and communication have been long used to make money and protect the wealth. The only way to know the real market is using math, because 1+1 is still 2. No surprise that technical is still playing well, until a strong hand does poison it to monetize and protect their interests.

Recently we should be surprised that central banks outside US, have been orchestrating easing. They are who are US allies. Can we see the evil here? Can we hear the evil here? Can we talk the evil here? Or can we do the evil here? No matter why yield is inverted, let the issue stay here.

Greece, land of Russians billionaires to park their money, fell down a decade ago. Italy and other PIGS who try to save it, are still enduring longest economic depression, longer than US depression in 1929. It’s the cost of austerity where Greece central bank is unable to supply Euro, which is under monopoly of ECB, which is under influence of bigger shark.

HongKong, land of Chinese billionaires is starting to shake when China tries to put extradition law to this biggest tunnel of money out flow from China. Could it be part of global yield inversion? I see HongKong has one main big issue. It pegs its currency to USD while it should go together with other countries to depreciate against USD. Similar to Greece, HongKong is highly dependent to US and its USD. What do billionaires in HongKong think about their money in such extreme high risk when this country can go bankrupt at any time? Eerie is everywhere and exit door is too small.

Who is going to bail out HongKong? US or China? If they go to China, people may get instructed to riot. If they go to US, they can easily get overpowered by Chinese army. HongKong issue seems to already spread into Singapore economy and two of them dictate premium property in Asia. Does it scare RBA enough? RBA rate cut is showing how they respond to risk of biggest surplus of Australia, which is coming from China, both in trade and account. It could stem into overdue Asia Pacific correction since 1997, when I self-experienced scary social unrest and first time I did deep study of GFC to many different business views. It was due to company debts bubble and could now be property and government debts bubble, through trade war, currency, and policy changes.

There should be no safer place to park your money unless you pay for its safety. Negative yield everyone? Trump always emphasizes that US won’t protect anyone money unless they pay or would US have such an ability to make more money unless everyone pays? Monopoly tends to work well.

Of course this issue is much complicated than what we ordinary can see. At the end, we are just market opportunist who is trying to follow where those money is moving. We do not need to see who is that evil, or hear that evil. We do not need to talk about that evil nor do the evil too. I think global money is starting to morph into something new and I would be just following money using my own money theories.

It leads me to classic technical play. An example of technical play is below. We did know well why we were doing big short to this company in May 2018. It broke both fundamentals (loosing arm of Veritas and Verisign, attacked by Google, long contract cheats, high debt, etc) and bad technical. We recently hear so many drama and mysteries, but seeing technical below in few seconds is enough to answer our curiosity, about what will happen to this company. There’s a Geisha make up by activists. Fundamental may not go better soon but activist play may draw stock price.

Another example, we do not need to hear any recent good news about fundamental of this company as well. We just need to know that easing is on play. It may not be favorable in short term but long term play should be strong enough. Who can win against central bank monopoly of their currency? Let traders try and we will do play with both of them.

I am a fan of any play and behavior of market participants, but recently the 4 wise monkeys inspires me much to overweight technical. When we can’t see in dark, don’t forget to always turn on the light.

I may have personal interest in any part of my article, therefore it’s not in any case of financial advise.

What you see/hear/do here and when you leave here, let it stay here.

Monopoly defines a stable society and a stable economy

Human endures many different paths of society, democracy, oligarchy, communism, etc. They do try to create a stable society in their own way and to preserve wealth.

Central banks have been long doing monopoly. They are monopolizing money printing. Local banks also have been long doing monopoly. They are the only ones can draw money from the central banks.

In public company, we do see many examples, Google and Adobe have been monopolizing their industry. Google search engine is no match to any. Adobe Photoshop is also no match to any other. We also do see merger and acquisition strategy which is simply an effort to create money from thin air after having bigger monopoly, 1+1=3. At the end, the monopoly can decide their price and PER ratio is no longer much working to them.

Monopoly may create higher PER/Price Earning Ratio

In technology, 5G, should also be in monopoly of the “greats” since they are a strategic global infrastructure. I mentioned in my article from early this year, we should just follow 5G monopoly. It simply works. Even in current high momentum of Telstra share price movement, we can clearly see a-not-so-invisible hand on play with the 5G monopoly, even though their NAS (Network and Application Services) is quite interesting to watch. Eventhough current technical may start to show a potential correction, previous strong hand plays is already detected and may surprise in future.

In Australia property, we should see big banks are starting to lower rate BUT something unique is being detected. We do see all big banks who has direct access to the currency monopoly, has been reluctant to pass full rate cut. In the mean time, currency supply from big banks and reverse carry trade should flood the market. We clearly see so many non confirming lenders are now offering 0.5% lower or more than big banks and attracts migrations from big banks to non-conforming lenders. It raises a question to me, why big banks who are monopolizing the currency access offers higher rate than the ones which can’t do monopoly. It should be clear that there are currently a lot of liquidity at the moment. I would have my own theory that they, who can do monopoly, should see profit margin and strength from property is deteriorating. Therefore they start to sell weak assets with help of their “grandfather”, in which in future they can simply make a policy change by orchestrating liquidity out from the market when good time for property comes back. In a normal action respond, it’s part of bounce back similar to death cat bounce.

How far monopoly can push their price before introducing too much competitors? In theory, Marginal Cost (MC) is equal to Marginal of Revenue (MR) and which is above Average of Total Cost (ATC). In property, marginal of revenue should have run down faster than decreasing of marginal of cost. For example when central banks cut rate from 1.5 to 1, the market rate should also decrease 4 to 3.5. While the profit margin is relatively same, the revenue and their profit margin should have gone down with fixed cost remains same. Therefore I believe it’s more profitable for big banks to run market rather than holding assets since cost to run market is lower. The other way around should happen when long term rate is starting to rebound or inflation is starting to kick in. That’s when I believe the big bank monopoly will start to reduce oxygen from the market.

We would then think bigger picture. When will inflation starts to kick in? We do know US is having benefit from monopolizing their strength of currency and enjoy this benefit while other countries like Europe and China are still having issue. I would have to agree with Fed, as long as they are still the only one monopolizing one biggest strong currency, they should be reluctant to cut rate like other countries. I would believe, when reversal time is coming, other countries could no longer do currency war and may start to increase rate. I would think that’s the time when Fed will start to do the other way around. With negative yield exceeds 13T$, there could be a big spike of inflation during the reversal. Market may fall, but inflation sensitive may then recover quicker than the other.

In the meantime, as predicted before, as the strongest currency, they can maintain Wall Street to continue their trend and slowly destroy global money value, unseen. This is what I describe as a stable currency where magic is happening and binary is formed. Inflation should be still far away because it broke MA200 ($TNX). As long as USD is strong, inflation should be in control. I don’t think we would see the reversal and market crash in next year or two. It’s simply because central banks currently demonstrate their habit of monopolizing money destruction and ample of liquidity is everywhere.

Monopoly is to make money. Money follows the monopoly.

My money theory is not in any case of financial advise.

]]>