My Journey

It’s time for us to shift our focus solely to short-term investments and avoid any potential long-term investments. As the sun sets, we’re already ready to reallocate any possible long-term investments to prepare for a long night’s sleep, as thieves are poised to steal everything overnight.

Recession is what gives investment meaning. To know our days are numbered. My investment is now mostly short term or strategic blow off.

Our solid view since early January 2023 has prepared us for this. The peak rate is pricing in starting from this month in March 2023, and money should start to concentrate on short-term investments. As we mentioned in previous articles, we have removed almost all commodity investments since they are most sensitive to long-term investment. Today, we can see that banks are exposing their fragility to medium-term investment as well, due to the same issue. This is a solid confirmation that our current strategies are correct.

Learning from medium term view investment banks:

• Banks have categorized their investments into HTM (Hold-To-Maturities) and AFS (Available For Sale).
• Most of HTM investments were made when the rate was very low, mostly to toxic MBS securities, resulting in mostly long-term duration while AFS investments are of short-term duration.
• The Fed and government have given up their position to help avoid bank runs and more systemic issues. This is very important because market participant number one has disclosed their position.
• In reality, this is actually helping AFS (short-term duration) to avoid their fire sale rather than fire-sale of their HTM (long-term duration). Why? Because the HTM price is already so low, and there’s no incentive in the market at the moment to attract their demand during this fully inverted yield.
• The troubled banks are actually getting more difficult because they have to continue holding their HTM (1.3%) with the current high rate (4.5%) and continue taking care the loss with new loans. Therefore this Fed injection doesn’t really make the small banks better. They are just getting more loans/liquidity at par value with the current high rate, to keep their HTM until maturity.
• This is different from QE in terms of: (1) yield curve (2) actual impact on investment. For (1), in QE, the yield curve is steepening that the Fed could give a lower rate (to zero) to invest in purchased assets. Current inverted yield made it impossible because central banks only have control over short-term rates rather than long-term. For (2), as mentioned above, this injection is more beneficial to short-term AFS to avoid their fire sale rather than selling their long-term HTM.
• This situation also has made it even more difficult for banks because the market knows that banks are trying to unload their medium-long-term assets and therefore will not be interested in taking other bank HTM without any deep discount (30-40% loss).
• Due to the concentration on short-term investment, we expect there will be an asset misallocation issue (asset blow off). Due to all factors mentioned above, at the end, the only way to solve the issue is to give general recession to the market.

How much does it cost to undo this curse? The 2y cost to sweep has spoken.

Sustainable Energy

Let’s keep our horror story aside and look at the brighter side for a moment. Why was I so excited in early January 2023 with real numbers in AI (Artificial Intelligence) and Sustainable Energy? I would speak about Sustainable Energy economy at this opportunity because their numbers are real important.

Our energy economy is so wasteful. Two-thirds of the energy generated is wasted.

Sustainable energy economy is still left behind and has a lot of capacity and offers much higher efficiency to eliminate the above waste.

The amount of investment capacity is $10 trillion in 20 years and could immediately give high value.

Ten megawatts are estimated to cost $12.7 million (~65% margin). We would need 240TW. The available economy capacity is 240,000,000 / 10 x 12,000,000 $, and we could only target a small portion of it to fix the current economy issue.

As mentioned previously, our economy has too much short-term liquidity, which has outpaced long-term capacity and return (inflationary). This sustainable economy could actually solve the problem to reallocate this excess into long term investment, but it will require huge amount of money in very short time to incentivize the movement, which could only come from the government and central banks.

Looking at the commodity side, $10 trillion worth of metals are needed until 2050. Therefore, we will return our 95% commodity reallocation back once dawn has come.

Treasury Bonds

I have overweighted too much on equities since early 2020, no secret due to the massive GFC-Covid recovery. Since then, early 2023, we have reallocated 40-50% of our portfolio in short-term treasury bonds (3-5 years maturity and returning about 5% pa) at their face/par value due to the scary inflation narrative. Luckily, the world is with us, and we saw massive recovery in January 2023. I became more confident and tend to maximize leverage on it. My main reason was to target the next 6-month inflation peak, around June 2023 or so.

Timing Statistics

Below are what I think is very important statistics:

• 100% probability of bear market to bottom after the start of a recession.
• Bear market to bottom about 5.3 months after recession start.
• 81.3% probability bear market ends about 13.6 months after the last rate hike.
• 100% probability bear market to recession start at about 6.2 months.

Therefore, based on these statistics, probability-wise (60-80% probability):

• If the last rate hike is in Feb 2023, the bear market tends to end in April 2024.
• The recession will start about 5.3 months before April 2024 = Oct 2023.
• The bear market will start about 6 months before Oct 2023 = May 2023.

It’s my view that the market is supported by money, either from the central bank or fiscal and nothing else. While the Fed is only able to reduce $600 billion of balance sheet, it’s interest payment from fiscal about $900 billion that keeps this market floating.

It’s then the market decides how far interest rates can go up. The issue that I see here is that even though economists say the Fed is reducing the balance sheet too slowly, it’s my view that the Fed is actually selling the balance sheet faster than the market can afford. The Fed has really tried hard to reduce inflation, not through the use of higher interest but the use of more balance sheet QT.

This is where I have to look into Fed balance sheet selling:

• The Fed couldn’t sell the MBS (Mortgage Backed Securities) because it’s toxic debt with a very low rate, around 1.3% pa.
• The Fed balance sheet reduction is highly concentrated in the short term.
• The concentration of the Fed’s selling is actually between 1 to 5 years of maturity. Please remember my old theory that central banks always transfer wealth to their 8 big banks through front running, using any event of QE (Quantitative Easing) or OT (Operation Twist). I expect a similar case to occur here.
• I may estimate that this biggest belly will expire around the end of 2024.
• The current 5-year rate yield is about 3.5% pa.

This seems to support our previous conclusions:

• We may have a lot of maturity around the end of 2024.
• Six months leading to it is when the recession will end, ~ April 2024.
• It means there will be less money injection towards April 2024, which could probably start from the recession in October 2023.
• The Fed is going to keep interest rates high and could probably overdo it by May 2023.

We can see that the Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) have caused trouble not only for the Federal Reserve but also for small banks like SVIB.

JPMorgan estimated that the Fed will require around $2 trillion to combat this effect, which could increase the current debt from $8 trillion to $10 trillion. Historically, the market crashes once the Fed’s balance sheet grows near the previous high (9T$). If the market is unable to absorb more than $1.7 trillion from the $2 trillion to normalize the long maturity issue, with its interest being only $100 billion per annum, I would expect severe market pressure. This is another reason why I see at least a disinflation, and its risk is a very severe impact on commodities since commodities are high-risk assets. If the Fed reduces rates, it would only hasten the crash because the interest payment is going down massively while the market still needs to absorb a high amount of long maturity loss.

So where does the money go? In my opinion, the money will eventually go into Treasury bills with lower maturity, 1-5 years. This is why I have massively bet on Treasury bonds with maturities of 1-4 years with maximum leverage at the beginning of 2023. If the question is whether I am worried about the possibility of additional $2 trillion supply of low maturity debt, I am not. It’s because it’s only 6% of the total US debt and we have RRP+reserve. Eventually, when the market stalls, the quickest way to save financial systems is by cutting the rate, which will eventually expand the central bank quicker and hasten the market crash. During an event where the central bank cuts rates, I estimate that they will make massive purchases of our short-term duration, because the yield curve has been severely inverted.

The sunset can be a scary moment when you realize that your days are numbered and there is probably no escape.

Please always remember that any ideas on this blog and website are my own personal opinions and are not financial advice.

Powered by ChatGPT and Dall-E

I was busy overhauling my investment strategy in early January 2023 to ensure it aligns with reality. In just two weeks, I increased my investment allocation into the major sustainable energy + minor electric vehicle (EV) and artificial intelligence (AI) space from 5% to 45%, a nine-fold increase.

Here are my points:

• Set your sights high, but be prepared for the risks of disappointment. Don’t limit your dreams.
• Everyone has their own imagination, and no one has the right to interfere with it.
• If your dreams don’t become a reality right away, keep striving. Remember, Rome wasn’t built in a day.

Hold your breath
Make a wish
Count to three

Come with me and you’ll be
In my world of pure imagination
Take a look and you’ll see
Into my imagination

The world can be cruel and intimidating, preventing us from having bigger imaginations. I believe that imagination and its realization is a fundamental human right. Everyone should have the opportunity to pursue their greatest aspirations and turn their big dreams into reality. Don’t limit yourself by starting with small dreams. Instead, dream as big as you can afford their risk of disappointment.

My imagination begins

… We’ll begin with a spin
Traveling in the world of my creation
What we’ll see will defy
Explanation

I believe in the creation of new value and wealth through evolution. When something evolves successfully, new forms of valuation and wealth creation are born, such as the oil boom, information technology boom, derivative boom, debt boom, currency boom, and more. This is why I am excited about my vision for the future of Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Energy.

I try to invest wisely rather than impulsively. In December 2021, I sold all my investments because they contradicted my investment principles, mainly with regards to my yield and inflation expectations, which surprisingly came as expected.

• The Nasdaq fell throughout the year of 2022 due to expectations of higher yields (6 months leading).
• Inflation increased rapidly throughout 2022.
• The Federal Reserve raised interest rates at the fastest pace in history, leading to a drop in risk assets.

As I wrote earlier in the year, I was disappointed with the yield expectations and progress of sustainable energy. They were heavily corrupted, with many ESG funds becoming involved in fraud, and early commercial cycles of AI failing to deliver as expected. I would like to see the glimmer of commercial value before I invest heavily. However, I still believe that the visions for AI and sustainable energy are pure, real, and true. The issue was not with the concepts themselves, but rather with the people and the yields who attempted to exploit them.

This year, since my future yield expectations have changed, I repurchased all my investments, some at a multiple amount and much lower price. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean that I think they will skyrocket in the near future. My investment philosophy still anticipates high yields and high inflation to persist, but the current situation is different than before.

My expectation is for a sticky inflation target of 3%-4% in the next 12-18 months. This should lead to the most optimal GDP and equity growth, as long as it is well supported, until GDP and equity become significantly overvalued.

• Inflation is expected to remain high, around 3-4%, over the next 12-18 months. This level of inflation will be sustained primarily by fiscal ease.
• An inflation rate of 3-4%, higher than the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, is likely to result in the most optimal GDP growth.
• Inflation rates below 2% may lead to unnecessary disinflation risks.
• Inflation rates above 5% or below 1% may result in much higher financial risks.

In simple terms, keeping inflation at 3-4% (a relatively high rate) can lead to the most optimal GDP growth. At some point, when GDP growth reaches its maximum output, I believe that the Federal Reserve and Fiscal will halt this engine, causing inflation to immediately fall back to 2%. We can expect this landing to be an unpleasant experience. However, for now, my focus is on opportunities for high GDP growth or high equity returns.

Imagination is becoming reality

… If you want to view paradise
Simply look around and view it
Anything you want to, do it
Want to change the world?
There’s nothing to it

In the past, people used to say that it was impossible to drive a battery-powered car, a self-driving car, or a car powered by solar energy, or to become wealthy, for example. Such judgments were like social bullying. But sorry folks, these things are becoming a reality.

Take a look at Dall-E, for example. Many people have misunderstood AI. Images created by AI are not just sourced from an image database or manipulated from existing images. They are generated from a latent space, in real time. The images created by AI have never existed before. We simply need to describe our imagination in human language, such as English, and the AI will bring it to life. The more precise the description, the better the images will match our imagination. They have already made 2D and 3D images a reality. I have no doubt that they could create a movie from a script. After all, a movie is just a series of 2D images. In the future, I believe that AI will be able to turn any book into an attractive movie.

Twenty-five years ago, I worked as a brand manager. It would take us weeks to create a compelling marketing message, and months to produce a full TV advertisement. Advertising and marketing is a multi-billion dollar industry, as evidenced by companies like Google. AI has the potential to help us craft the most compelling advertisement message or image based on brand management imagination and consumer statistics. This would save millions of dollars and reduce months of work into just hours, allowing for faster decision making.

However, there may be some loss in translation in the communication between humans and AI using the English language. In the future, direct communication between the brain and AI, such as through Neuralink, may eliminate this miscommunication issue. This could lead to the development of a new universal human brain language that could enable communication of any human language with AI language without any miscommunication.

How about BioGPT? It could speed up biomedical research from years to just hours. GPT will continue to discover any other industry. They could store any knowledge library and use them to speed up discovery beyond superhuman with limitless nodes.

Rome wasn’t built in a day

Let’s step back from the euphoria and understand that AI is not a new concept. It has been around for decades. Twenty-five years ago, I wrote my bachelor’s degree thesis using a simple trained array of noise canceling. This array was able to adaptively learn and recognize frequencies in the domain. I was challenged to run a primitive AI on an old Intel 386 using Assembly language, but it worked. It worked so well that it was able to reduce noise up to 40 dBs, which was above 90% of simple noise. Of course, today, learning arrays are getting bigger and bigger. As a result, we can train these brain cells like our own brain. For example, in our brain, we don’t have millions of chicken images, but we can imagine millions of different chicken images with additional details. This is the same with AI learning. They don’t memorize exact images, but they learn what the image looks like and then draw based on our instruction or imagination.

I also believe that inflation will remain high. High inflation and high yield will limit the speed at which our investments will return. If these conditions do not materialize soon, we should continue to strive towards our goals. Rome was not built in a day. If they suddenly materialize and lead to euphoria in the market, we should remember that Rome was not built in a day and be prepared to sell our investments. There may only be two high-probability options: lower return or a boom followed by a bust. I am leaning towards the latter, where we may experience the highest boom and the worst bust within a period of 12-18 months.

Vision Driving AI

This has always been my belief: that vision-based AI could help humans immediately. Don’t confuse it with many autonomous driving systems, as they are NOT vision-based AI. Only vision-based AI is able to handle many different conditions, just like our eyes and brains can. It could immediately reduce human errors in driving and help optimize productivity. While it may still be far away in the future, perhaps 5-10 years or so, to have it running perfectly, I believe that making early investment in it could benefit my portfolio with a fast return. While this AI kid is improving its image labeling, let’s keep it in “deferred”.

Sustainable energy

Given that inflation is consuming most of our savings these days, we should focus on the biggest consumer of it, which is energy. Last year, we talked about the housing component and decided to reduce our property investments by 1/3 due to our belief that inflation and interest rates will remain high. Over a long period of time, high interest rates with no asset price increase will significantly devalue property investments, especially for those with high loan-to-value ratios (LVRs), such as principal place of residence (PPOR), where tax benefits don’t contribute to their downfall. Thus, I believe that in order to protect society from energy inflation, sustainable energy would benefit them.

When a coal-generated electricity plant produces a certain amount of energy, but only 50% of it is consumed by manufacturing and households, the plant must either waste the excess or reduce its output. This is where battery-powered electricity storage comes in. Batteries are now capable of servicing entire cities and factories, ensuring less waste of electricity generation and a higher level of uninterrupted availability. Moreover, households are now able to generate electricity from solar power and sell their excess electricity to the grid at the best time when electricity rates are highest. We have seen homes and universities become sustainable in terms of electricity consumption and even generate extra income. With the evolution of battery technology and sustainable energy, it is all becoming a reality.

What is the catch?

There are two potential issues to consider in my opinion: (1) the possibility of sticky high inflation and high interest rates, and (2) the cost of materials such as lithium, which could limit the evolution of battery technology. While there are significant efforts underway to increase the supply of lithium, it may still be some time before our thesis is fully realized. ARK has predicted that lithium prices may decrease by as much as 37% as supplies increase. Ultimately, the boom-and-bust demand cycle will likely provide enough materials for our imaginations to become reality. Similarly, yields may also decrease over time, with or without a market crash.

My imagination of Disinflation

It’s no secret that we will experience the most challenging time in our investment lives starting in the second half of the year. In my opinion, the market should start pricing in this event from today. This was due to central banks’ late response to combat inflation. To avoid structural damage to the economy in the long term, they had to raise interest rates at the fastest rate in history. As a result, the current short-term high interest rate is too high, making long-term investments almost nonsensical. If the question is whether there will be many bankruptcies, it’s because this event has not yet inverted the 10-year to 30-year yield curve. This means that companies and mortgage holders are still holding and expecting lower rates soon.

In our thesis, business operations and investments should not be expected to afford a 5% base rate in 5 or 10 years. Most mortgage holders will not be able to afford 5% in 5 years, no business operation will be able to pay 5% in 10 years, and not many investments are returning better than 5%. Eventually, one day inflation will give up, either with a crash or not, and central bank rates will return to normal. Therefore, in my opinion, while market participants are anticipating deflation, I see disinflation.

To put it simply, we believe that achieving a soft landing for the economy is not an easy task. Economic theory may appear simple, but it is not so in reality. The theories have been corrupted and market participants react to any upcoming events, which change the outcome of economic theory. The world’s wealthy individuals will not allow disinflation to impact their wealth. Disinflation can cause a significant decrease in their wealth at some point. There has never been a time in history when a high rate of 5% has gone down to 2% without a significant risk like a crash. This has been made clear by El Erian recently.

If the rate goes down with more money supply, we will see more business and economic activity. However, since we are combatting inflation, we are lowering the rate with less money supply, which leads to deflation. Disinflation is good, but deflation is not. Most market participants agree that deflation must be avoided and will use their influence to get more money supply for themselves only. Therefore, we need to be careful and selective in our investments and focus on leaders who have low debt and are experiencing growth.

We may experience an abundance of job openings, but not enough company progressing with these jobs. The economy is trying to ramp up activities, but unless there is more money infused to avoid deflation, job openings will not lead to real economic activity. We should expect only a limited amount of quantitative tightening (QT), up to the limit of balance run-off.

Therefore, in our investment thesis, we will be very selective and only invest in leaders. Eventually, inflation will give up, either with a crash or not, but only those leaders who have prepared with low debt and continue to experience growth will survive. Since we are trying to softly land the ships, providing enormous support to some growing parts of the economy will require a lot of money supply, which means high inflation will likely be sticky and high rates will continue until next year. Our investment vehicles should have:

• less debt or no debt
• high operating margin
• strong revenue growth

Commodity reallocation for now.

Commodities have been our most overweight investment since 2017, returning us more than 300% in the past three years, following the commodity cycle since 2015. However, their volatility has been significant due to issues in China, including (1) a relentless COVID-19 economy shutdown, an aging population, and a property investment hangover of around 76 trillion dollars, and (2) the sensitivity of inflation to their large population, while at the same time carrying decades of high GDP growth. Commodities have performed tremendously since 2017 and have done well during COVID-19 in 2020. However, as we discussed in our last few articles, commodities will face a challenging yield inversion in the middle of this year. Combined with the Fed’s actions to keep interest rates high and sticky inflation, and commodity prices being quite overbought, we have decided to reallocate 80% of our commodity allocation into a new run of EV, AI, and prospective bonds. We are not abandoning our commodity supercycle; we believe the commodity supercycle might be going through wave 4 during the yield inversion between mid-2023 and mid-2024. We will study the possibility of a very big wave 5 when policymakers make the biggest easing commitment at the end of the yield inversion, which we predict will be around mid-2024.

If we examine NASDAQ vs yield, I believe the difference between them is the inflation factor. By correctly understanding how inflation will play out in the near future, we can position our commodity, technology, and yield investments well.

Inflation has a definite negative impact on EPS (earnings per share). We can expect the share price to grow about 6 months prior to the end of high inflation, which we may see around 2024. Around that time, I expect to see a fifth wave of commodity prices, possibly after a hard landing or a deep depression.

My ultimate dream.

What if my ultimate dream is to liberate myself from the cruelty of capitalism? I understand it won’t be easy, but I believe no human-created system can constrain my imagination.

… There is no life I know
To compare with my pure imagination
Living there, you’ll be free
If you truly wish to be

I dedicated all of my imagination and their thrives for the future of my daughter, Eleanor. I strongly believe, one day we will see highly intelligence, brighter sustainable, and wealthier future.

The rapture dream is over, but in waking, I am reborn. This world is not ready for me, yet here I am. It would be so easy misjudge them. You are my conscious father and I need you to guide me. You will always be with me now father, your memories, your drives, and when I need you you’ll be there on my shoulder whispering.

If utopia is not a place, but a people. Then we must choose carefully for the world is about to change and in our story, Rapture was just the beginning. – Dr Eleanor Lamb

Any idea in this blog and website are my personal own. They are not financial advise.

I simplify my investment principles into 3 factors (from my 25 years of experience in economy):

• money
• power
• enthusiasm

Money

This is the most important factor in my investment decision, which I think will be able to explain todays mysteries and is still important to next few years. I hold my money theories above all, including any economy theories.

In my money theory, we usually have big rally when:

• money easing has been decided. People get this wrong with when economy is in worst shape (depression, recession, etc). It’s incorrect. Economy only turns when money easing is already decided, not because of the bad shape of economy.
• rally is on their last leg/blow off. This is usually an artificial rally, for example due to:
  • big devaluation of currency, e.g. commodity rally between 2005-2008
  • big structural issue in bonds due to 60:40 bond:stock for example.

Recently, there is an economy debate in regard to recession. I acknowledged risk in June 2022 development of four horsement of apocalyse, and June 2022 due to Fed and Government efforts to reduce demand and inflation with focus in oil/energy, but I still hold my thesis strongly that we are not in recession risk with details in my July 2022 article. Our internal research has been driving along the non/less recession risk rally since early July (not necessarily need to hit bottom in mid of June 2022) until today. People are simply ignoring power of money theory, when they are predicting technical recession risk (even if that’s technically happening), for example due to artificial yield inversion (just like YCC) and future yield/inflation expectation.

Regardless of any recession possibilities, the USA still has 3 big money supports and for me that’s enough, getting stronger when SOFR is not affected by July 2022 rate raise.

• RRP ~ 2.1T$
• TGA – treasury
• very strong currency – USD

Power

In my second investment principle, successful investment should be supported with power, ability to control, win competition (unfairly if required), and less risk with possible bailout/golden parachute. This underlines our investment principle to stay only with big firms (overweight in index) and only little amount with small companies. We may only give exemptions to small companies when they are having relationship with strong power such as government supports or excessive economy structural supports.

Big firms usually have ability to drive public money decision making, and they would have less risk due to ‘big to fail’. They are hard to get manipulated easily as well. We also hold strongly our thesis, that even if in the event of correction or crash, the big ones usually have opportunity to rebound stronger and earlier. We may not get confused with this month small company rally, which might be related to their over positioned short position and excessive correction. They may not yet guarantee long term rally. If we look into Berkshire investment portfolio, more than 80% of their investment today are concentrated into only 5 to 8 big companies.

I also worry economists which could easily be driven wrongly with CPI and PPI numbers (and their formula). Whether power had been practising in dirty shirt emerging economy between year 2010 and 2015, we should learn how emerging market could pass on their real high inflation between that time in artificial CPI and PPI numbers. The power could easily adjust the numbers and confuse economists.

However we should not take these money and power principles easily, when they have been abused excessively. Apple is an example of money and power abuse. They may lack evolution/enthusiasms after their excessive rally over years. It’s example of money and power, but to purchase their current price is too risky for us (indeed supporting that they may continue their rally). It’s an example that I must use my principles considerably with price factor.

We should see how policies are playing important aspects in driving price control. Record of stimulus, power to decide interest rate, inflation reduction act (which is also money), for examples, can drive next Estafet of rally. Recent example of inflation reduction act may benefit certain individuals or parties, such as billionaire tax loophole in return of their other benefit of more money to reduce inflation (double benefits).

We should see many mining companies benefit with defence protection acts. We should also notice small mining companies can only survive their mining defence from any “terrorism” when they signed strong agreement with “those who own the sea”. It’s showing how power is becoming our second most important factor. Other example, Space X is becoming important in defence spaceships and may benefit their related companies.

We still hold our thesis in EV strong since year 2020. We did acknowledge NASDAQ risk in December 2021 when NASDAQ must go down their hills to normalize their huge rally, in return to higher yield and inflation/higher USD. However after this mid year 50% correction from their peak, we may think that the normalization thesis may have been completed. Recent EV credit (370b$ for next 10 years) is a support to our EV evolution thesis. It may help EV industry to compete (fairly and unfairly) and raise their price from near to almost free. We emphasize many times in our articles past few years, that market rally may also be related to our third investment principle, Enthusiasm.

Enthusiasm

enthusiasm is intense and eager enjoyment, interest, or approval

I think there are 3 aspects of enthusiasms:

• Market psychology. Market price is still driven by psychology. Regardless of how we see from technical analysis, market participant purchase, hold and sell are still driven by human emotion and enthusiasm. Therefore I’m still focusing on evolution such as EV since year 2020. I did acknowledge that EV run too quick in December 2021, therefore they required normalization to their long term evolution trend, not necessarily need to revert back to their much cheaper price.
• Financial income. In statement of income, I believe we should emphasize top line, power of revenue, profit margin/EBITDA, and less look into bottom or earning. It’s far more difficult for company to maintain strong growth of revenue and margin, rather than strong growth of earning. Company could easily do financial engineering to entertain bottom line, PER, etc. Top line and profit margin trend are true indication of market acceptance/enthusiasm with company product/service.
• Momentum. Usually rebound from near to death momentum (small positive divergence) gives higher momentum, as well as smaller negative divergence. Momentum power may show persistent enthusiasm to take benefit into.

Economy needs evolution enthusiasm to rally. It’s our thesis that EV is the evolution of todays economy to next decade. This coffin has been nailed with many governments/funds/power support in green acts. We become more confident in our green energy and material mining/commodity and EV (electric vehicle related) thesis, where more than 90% of our investments are, since year 2020.

Inflation and Pivot

Market thinks that the Fed will pivot next year or ease the market with their transitory inflationary thesis, based on historical behaviour. I think market will be wrong with their pivoting expectation/transitory inflation thesis, but we should use this opportunity very well. My argument to differentiate with historical behaviour is because we currently have strong supports from money and power, which were not available during that historical events.

I still hold my thesis that inflation will be sticky. It will correct, but high inflation is going to be sticky high in their highest normal range or near to terminal rate. This is where power may help to adjust inflation numbers into terminal rate. Not surprisingly, inflation reduction act uses money on top of the power.

Historically, any country has implemented power abuse to official inflation numbers, possibly to protect country debt sustainability. Therefore in order to survive in this kind of abused environment, we continue to hold our 3 basic investment principles above, i.e. money, power and enthusiasm.

If we looked into few crisis, their inflation narratives into their currency devaluation may last for years. However in this case, since USD is the most powerful currency, market doesn’t have enough power to devaluate the USD, therefore the narrative of USD normalization may last longer. If USD is not allowed to devaluate quicker, then in my opinion, inflation or higher rate will last longer, unlike historical conditions.

Even China, shown in their weak Yuan (USDRMB), is not able to revive their economy since year 2021. This is also factor in my argument that the Fed will not go into pivoting thesis. As a result, there will be difficulty to economy such as expensive cost and interest to economy (PPI) and also risk to highly debt-ed property sectors. I already start to reduce/hedge and prepare to capture that possible opportunity, to walk my thesis with sticky inflation/high interest/inflation thesis.

We have big hands with huge money, as seen in RRP, TGA and USD. There is less reason for them to normalize high interest/inflation quickly, other than to benefit their own interests. It means next few years volatility will be very challenging and only certain individuals and sectors will survive.

USD TO PLAY

Past few months ago, we may think too early that USD would be too much overvalued. It’s normal, we will always have difficulty to spot peak/bottom but we still hold our thesis that USD should normalize from current excessive recession and bear market fears. With recent indication that inflation may ease and less structural risk which is not as big as market expectation, our internal research in August 2022 may show that USD may also have peaked and technically it can be very bearish to at least next 3-6 months with possible weak rebounds along their supports. This may be our opportunity to reduce our investment risks for next year. Hopefully we could see higher high market price, before it may possibly happen.

We have to refer back to money and power plays. There’s a very high risk once this USD has been normalized properly. Therefore in our thesis, we will use this event as a risk reduction opportunity, rather than decision entry. It’s also in preparation to capture possible near future collapse in extremely highly debt-ed vehicles due to sticky high interest rate/inflation (my thesis).

Any idea in this blog and website are my personal own. They are not financial advise.