My Journey

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbZYe4yTrpQ

The world is full of people who could harm you.
I can move! I can talk! I can walk. I’m alive!
A lie keeps growing and growing until it’s as clear as the nose on your face.
You thought you knew already? Pinocchio is not just a Puppet (Prophet?), he’s a MIRACLE to OUR PROBLEM.
Pinocchio, Pinocchio, please tell me the truth!?

Think about a situation in our life, when we had massive bills (mortgage, necessities, business due payments, investment, health, etc) all due together and we have to honour them all. At same time lenders (markets) are forcing to pay NOW (threatening) at much higher rate. On the other side, the lenders/markets still have too much excess money that they are willing to make loss (negative yield and RRP). What will be solution to the situation?

For the sake of saving of billions of economy participants, we might need help from a malarkey. None should be surprising with increasing historical abuse of economy politics (foreign exchange manipulator, beggar thy neighbour, etc) from all market participants. Regardless, our job as data scientist is to take advantage/understand truthfully of market participants behaviour. My idea is not new. My three years ago article, a pinocchio, is still holding strong. That’s when I started accumulation number in nothing, but inflation, which is nothing but ALL today. Those who understand might continue to survive and should my 25 years of interest be in this industry. Joe Biden likes the word of Malarkey and I think it may proxy the idea well.

Wall street doesn’t have any clue about working economy, give me a break, that’s a bunch of malarkey.

Of course, dancing with a bunch of Wall Street wolves, we should not take strategy lightly. September 2019 was obviously a time where overnight repo became a broken lie, continued with curve inversion and correction at the end of that year 2019, the CoVid. It’s no different today, should we learn from history. There’s a time where hiding the truth might be broken and we should be prepared for it, not to stop, but to take advantage of their possible correction, and then to continue again after.

To avoid disruption to economy systems, money should always need to be sanitized. Money is bouncing back and forth between central bank and government, until they can find a place in or driving our economy. Do we remember our possible big catalyst of anode and cathode from our last month article. When it was written, Europe and Japan green shots was unclear. It might now be becoming obvious, German Bund jumps tremendously and broke their historical negativity. We shouldn’t be surprised that ECB, BOJ and RBA are still lowering their tone down. Their inflation thrust is just crossing zero mark, for the USA inflation to keep pulling them out.

Our job as economy street middleman is to run this economy and possibly getting paid from it. Currently there is a lot of money due to move from treasury to central bank and central bank hands are shackled from ability to sanitize, due to their mandates. Inflation is too high, while the decision makers should face the truth to possibly redo malarkey strategy.

In this situation where we couldn’t satisfy all interests, where I think most of victims is only our belief that economies would need to run efficiently and faith that decision makers would abide to their mandates. Therefore it may be best time in our life, to reconsider the use of necessity defence. It’s not something new. Both sides of market participants have been decades of using economy necessity defence actions with economy politics/national security. Possibly the best solution is to keep our best effort to abide our mandates and implement necessity defence only as necessary. Public will critic the malarkey, but hopefully they understand, it’s for their important necessity defence.

Before we take deeper look into the malarkey, let’s do our health checks.

• Since our article 3 moths in November 2021, NASDAQ heavy trucks still continues rolling down hill and sparking very high inflation. Commodities (EV infrastructure) and Oil (one of our top energy pick) are burning high and takes massive toll of interest in early February 2022. It does seem look similar to 2015. Please be aware.

• EV dip buying trade continues to provide better option to correct their high valuation.
• German lead Euro crosses negative cathode to positive anode. It’s our belief that a small negative to positive could make more impact than high positive to higher. Same applies to Japan.
• Last but not the least, my expectation of volatility came true and it’s as expected. Inflation volatility shot into one of highest in past decade since our last month article.

Lets have a look into inflation components where they should take priority and do any possible re-engineering.

For Australia, biggest weights are housing (23%), food (16%) and transport (11%). With China and Asia property in slower growth, and already in expensive property cycle, it makes it hard to raise inflation number further. With good food resource and location near to resources, this shouldn’t make lots of increase.

USA looks likely to have same weights. However it has quite substantial increase in energy and fuel, which Australia doesn’t have.

Which is quite same to Europe to some degree:

It’s quite obvious as well, oil as main barometer of the energy, has left their relatives far behind.

No surprising, democrats have been well known with energy issue and their historical party trouble with energy and oil.

Some would argue, that is a malarkey. US shale is just making more cash flow! I’m not suggesting US LNG which have been able to suppress European energy crisis, is enough to come forward and solve the energy issue.

Despite UAE under pressure to keep their weight increase, other OPEC members seem to be muted. It’s no surprising, only UAE can weather costly green initiatives, while other OPEC members should stay quiet. Good for UAE, they can be one of few players in Oil and Gas and bring their troubled economy and ARAMCO back to shine again.

I narrow down all of this madness to only ONE question:

Are the USA and Europe, biggest countries in this world, currently with huge capital excess, be able to bring energy cost down?

We should know that if the answer is NO, that’s a bunch of malarkey!

Next question, should energy be manageable, do we allow financial index to climb much higher? Please remember at the moment, US BIG refinancing bills are due, meaning it shouldn’t stop climbing per se. Questioning ability of the USA to control (not to bring down) energy cost, is questioning ability of who owns the sea, e.g. South China Sea (Taiwan and Hong Kong) and Crimea (Ukraine).

USA is the main actor that I described initially at the start of this article. They would just need to give US, Europe, Japan and Australia time to heal their refinancing bills and everything will be great again. However, just like our CoVid 2020 strategy, many market participants might exploit this situation to take advantage of possible correction or sector rotation. Please do prepare well.

I should stay with my course that Emerging market is about to start their due:

This is where I think energy needs to be hidden from fossil one into other form like Electricity. With electricity being greenly subsidized well (as usual) and can be produced from many forms of committers (nuclear, green, wind, solar, hydrogen, etc), it might be easier to control the energy number. As long as the number is great, it’s a green light for the economy, I meant the financial world. What else? That’s a malarkey.

In order to do that, as usual, we need more victim/participants. There are lots of bullish call for oil above 100$ under their expiry term.

This project as explained in previous articles, were due to acute capital and expenditure in past decade, and their investment door is being shut down with green initiatives, leaving only few niche big players.

This hunger game is expected to run long. Green ETF is still much lower, much less crowded, not yet attracting much investments. Therefore this inflation issue might still be strong, until the green energy is populated well. I believe the efforts are there. However I believe fossil fuel narrative is still far away from being over.

To support my arguments above, investors to US debts are more than willing to make loss and support strong US economy growth. They are professionals who conduct daily professional work in the area, therefore I won’t doubt that they will be correct (drop in inflation/correction in share market/stronger USD to name of few possibilities).

As written in previous articles, I’ve been living in big inflation environment for almost 40 years and they always intrigue me. I don’t see any surprise and indeed our last month article had already predicted incoming big continuous volatility. During that, I expect to experience strength of our inflation vehicles (EV infrastructures, metals, food, energy, and a start of traded accumulation of EV) with a possible BLIP in near future. We should start to slowly diversify our inflationary vehicles to embrace controllable high inflation and escape from the crowded oil play.

I’m not predicted crash in US inflation but I’m predicting flatter or slower growth of US inflation at about sustainable 3-5%, that could guarantee optimum economy and financial growth (yes higher financial growth, the Wall Street). This should also support my articles few months back in which I was expecting authorities to give inflation tightening ABOVE market expectation. It seems my wish is coming true, market is already pricing near to 7 points increase, while the Fed is still not yet moving from their near zero rate front end and to keep their QE running well.

We may see clearly how Central Banks are now behind market inversion curve but current situation might be different from past 30 years. Should we see for first time in history, financial market survives during curve inversion? I don’t think that’s not impossible. Central Banks could easily subsidise their banks for the sake of US government and passing through this inflation storm, to behold my number one money principle strategy, economy is nothing else but strongest (the USA) interests. I understand why my principle will be called Malarkey, but it could be the main key/answer to our main investment questions. We may disclose further strategy, as we move along in next few months.

In doing so, I’m starting to lower my tone from high inflationary loudspeakers in past 2 years into lower tone of innovation in energy. Lets’s continue to navigate our investment journey well.

After any possible blip in this year or two, let’s continue our journey to infinity and beyond.

As timeless tale is as old as time, any idea that you may possibly read or hear from this blog website is my personal own. They can not be used in any case of financial advise.

Nobody does it better
Makes me feel sad for the rest

Nobody does it quite the way you do
Why’d you have to be so good?

Baby you’re the best!

Following relentless bullish thesis past 2 years, do we still hold our inflation play tight? Since my article two months ago prior to Omicron, I should still think this year is last best possible investment time windows. It was shown in yield curve, possible end of ultra low rate era, and seems to match significant short term SOMA maturity. The Federal Reserve might have less option for treasury to seek their refinancing, which may contribute to weakness of USD. We might agree, faster raising price usually happens when bullish is about to end and it may lead to temporary/unsustainable inflation/price increase.

I should still hold my thesis in December 2021, that when heavy load NASDAQ goes down hill in lower gear, it will spark inflation. During this NASDAQ selling pressure, I believe money maker will keep juicing them, possibly because opponents are still taking opposite positions. Due to this newly created money, in my own opinion, it should be followed with newly investment hedge in inflation, which could lead to significant further price increase in commodities, like oil and metals; also since commodities are currently at lowest weight.

To double hedge the data, I would pick EV (Electric Vehicle) and their infrastructure numbers. In my argument, the EV still offers attractive long term sentiment (seen in China low emission record sale, increasing green bonds and their policy). Based on history, I would believe price is leaning more towards sentiment/prospect, rather than current financial analysis score. For example, EV has been notoriously known as expensive share, compared to other technology shares, like DOCU, TWTR, etc. However due to its evolution, I believe EV will still perform much better. I may see few financial engineering options for them to grow much further.

I also prefer to pick EV related technology rather than inflation related consumer technology, e.g. in FCPI (Apple, Microsoft, and Coca Cola). I’m not saying Apple and Microsoft won’t perform well during this inflation. I think they will. However I still believe EV would perform better. Unlike Cathie Wood strategy to abandon some of her innovative one to other small technologies, I prefer to hedge every increase in inflation with traded dip buying data in EV and EV infrastructure. I think ARKK investors are still interested with long future invention/hype like EV, rather than current not so wonderful evolution technology, causing relentless selling.

It shouldn’t give impression that it is an easy pick. Inflation has strong correlation to volatility. We should expect persistent volatility, e.g. Omicron, Oil drama, Digital Coin crash, and ultimate horror of Fed taper, rate raise and QT (Quantitative Tightening). That means, we should keep enough liquid or always maintain our pain level in-check, especially when it hits upper channel. We should acknowledge, only strong thesis/numbers can navigate our highly leveraged inflation journey. One early comforting sign, fireworks at the end and new of year, is usually/statistically a sign of a roaring event follow up.

New year, is statistically time to review back. Since year 1995, financial industry always intrigues me. Do I have a dejavu gen from my parents, when they had financial difficulty? After learning known economy theories, I still grow interest with never-ending research of known-unknown. It’s very rare to see economists speaking honestly about their secret society recipes, either due to their trade secret or insanity perception of their thesis. Since I believe economy is a living organism, it might be wise to say past experience never guarantees future performance and should all human known economy theories. A bliss, keeping them secret might prolong their lifespan longer.

Blindly use known economy theories to make money is simply too good to be true.

1997 Asian crisis was my first personal self experience, under real and rubber bullet. It was a remarkable experience of financial destruction, which burned most of South East Asian life and put them into massive global slavery, including me and my family. Few characteristics of the crisis includes:

• previously high foreign debt (trap?),
• high inflation,
• resiliency of SME (Small and Medium Enterprise),
• bailout for wealth transfer, and
• weaker currency.

Two years later, in magical city of Kristiansand, I was stunned with lots of smiles I had never seen in my life. Lots of wealth, no lie, did money buy happiness? Rather than spending most of my time to write master thesis to find secret of the SME resiliency during financial crisis, I spent most of my time to find secret of Scandinavian financial happiness. Did we remember story of Scandinavian farmers got busted in LEH (Lehman Brothers) crisis? Do we know Norge and Israel keep their leverage high in US stocks and indeed they make so much more?

No surprise in year 2008 GFC (Global Financial Crisis), after 10 years, I still failed to understand this secrecy of wealth protection systems. Learning is always costly and better be when we were young and fool. However, persistent, I always believe, another decade is always another story, always be much better. To be successful, we must always be optimistic.

To proof financial is a systematic systems, in 2017, an economist was able to show a simple mathematical formula of IOER, Fed balance sheet interest payment, etc, to figure out when Fed would break their unsustainable deflation spell to sustainable inflation. Same to the 1997 Asia Financial Crisis, same financial destruction to Turkish Lira. I think South Korean Default movie (2018) may explain it well cinematically. Should we consider it as a non random generator of phi (ϕ)? Should we say sorry to Turkish people for our human created financial weapon systems? Personally experienced with decades of inflation, in early 2020, I all-in believed in incoming global high inflation, if not hyperinflation.

I took insane research in 2019 with overweighting data towards property sector for resiliency. I believed the property rally won’t be over yet, due to its missing inflation component. I leveraged the data into newly created CoVid in early 2020, to advanced countries with strong GDP. Looking at how much liquid has been created and how the Central Banks policies are moving behind their curve, they seem to push inflation to hyperinflation cliff. In that cliff hanger game, only advanced country with high buffer margin to inflation would be able to survive. Unfortunately that means, the data must take short position to emerging economies to hedge.

I believe we should endure second phase of 2020-2023 mature inflation life cycle. While this is not 100% best return of this decade, it should provide strong leveraged resiliency during the inflation crisis. The world shouldn’t be dictated by god playing dictator ideally, if we are looking at fraction of the ϕ. How many of us missing the boat of growth vehicles like BTC and NFT, rather than keeping our economy theories in value growth vehicles? I am one of them. I think in my case, it was due to our perception that money is still too much valuable and our regular post traumatic GFC (Global Financial Crisis) stress disorder (PTGSD). This growth stock should rather work well to newly breeds who didn’t have any PTGSD gen yet. However they should still be aware that going zero stress disorder might mostly hit late comers. I don’t say value growth is dead. Apple has proven to reach first 3T$ valuation and experience enormous growth.

I still believe persistence in another decade should write another story.

Year 2021 might hand over long monetary era to the hand of fiscal. Many see massive future calls like MSFT from insider fiscal related participants. Due to that, tightening with fiscal support should differentiate from previous taper tantrum in 2013 or rate rise attempt in 2017. While some strategists might expect a following easing or twist operation (OT), I might think differently. In my opinion, if we believe in Central Banks is to behave like previously, we might end up to same failure to Central Bank transitory thesis. While many including me long believed inflation would be persistent, I don’t think Central Banks were serious with their transitory thesis. Why did they keep buying TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities)? Soros market participants theory of reflexivity?

This is where I quickly see connected dot with the 1997 Asian GFC inflation.

Few recent signs are Fed admittance to permanent inflation, lost control in 2Y, behind the curve, and persistence in long term yield raise. I should think, this probability might have less chance if China is not rising by that much. However looking at recent China condition, it seems they might still need another decades before they can be an inflation director. I don’t believe China could come any near to challenge the US yet.

To explain in simple number, why none is able to take advantage of the US, which has 8% inflation (going to be market expected 10%) and only gives 1.6% return from their most liquid asset on this planet, the 10Y? US debt investors are loosing their money more than 6.4% every year. They might think inflation to drop and or looking possibility of USD appreciation to compensate. However back to Fed SOMA and Treasury refinancing theory, I think they may not be able to catch up of their potential loss, depending on spectrum of their maturity. There should be a limit to where USD could appreciate, before it triggers either too high inflation loss or global M&A account transfer. This leads to my next theory.

In my theory, when US was in deflation, Federal Reserve took the loss. It should be similar to when US is above high inflation range. In my previous theory RRP is Central Bank subsidy to inflation loss to take over from their octopus, with many front runners as usual. This is where magic of global currencies/coin may work. If the Fed takes the loss, other weaker countries will take over the loss.

We should see DXY starting to break their lower channel to support the inflation thesis. I would watch Japan (JPY/USD) and Europe (EUR/USD) for possible main drivers. Being superior in their negativity/deflation might come to an end.

Don’t be confused with the US inflation in 1980 and 1945. Current 10 year yield is only 1.5%, vs 16% in 1980. This is another proof that China is still much weaker to challenge US as world biggest economy. Only US and advanced economies can navigate this high inflation well, unlike Asia in 1997 and probably China today. This should validate my strategy to leverage advanced countries and taking opposite to emerging numbers.

Taking high inflation pill is debt sin forgiveness. This is where I doubt SME resiliency in current inflation situation since they have lower debt load. Therefore I think SME won’t be able to survive well in this high global inflation crisis. I would also think global and internal trade issue due to CoVid might have big contribution to SME issue, rather than giving them resiliency to the global change crisis. I think we should see widespread bankruptcy in small business and increasing profit in large companies, until I expect to see more big M&A (Merger and Acquisition), rather than corporate buyback activities. Supporting my previous opinion, I believe private buy back strategy is still offering enough benefits to weather current high risks. This is why I don’t prefer to overweight my data against small cap companies.

Characteristics of current US inflation crisis, to differentiate with emerging economies inflation crisis:

• high internal debt,
• global inflation where no body does it better than the US,
• weak SMEs and possible widespread of bankruptcy in small countries,
• global bailout,
• unsustainable strong currency, which should then lead to weaker currency to support inflation run.

So far, only the US country:

• can escape themselves from internal GFC deflation crisis and also navigate high inflation crisis,
• can decide non bankruptcy of imminent death of HK offshore listing of China property sector,
• have optimum return, while other world is relatively muted with China lower growth in 2021.

Nobody does it better. Nobody does it half as good as you. United States, you’re the best!

Why’d you have to be so good? It’s no secret from our 2 years ago GDP expectation. Basically only the US has ability to juice their market. Due to that, the US has absorbed most of global money creation in past 2 years, which has been driving their index, causing envy to most other countries. Have a look into emerging and smaller countries, they are suffering massive capital outflow to the US, while they have to fight for internal inflation.

It left emerging country dried with liquidity and stuck with high inflation to support their growth. If China has difficulty and so do other countries smaller than China, which makes only the US, one of only few winners here. Does China take hostage of other economies too, through the use of their infrastructure for resource programme?

In Indonesia. The liquidity was so severe that one of biggest national owned steel company was about to go bankrupt in December 2021. They have no choice, but to open liquidity tap again, and face the truth of inflation pain. Unfortunately, this situation may leave less room for emerging to juice their market. Therefore I would rather see emerging to be a possible late global inflation player.

Does the US have to worry about maximum inflation when this competition symbiosis becomes endosymbiosis? They would most likely run taper, balance runoff, and reluctant to raising rate. I still believe in my theory, that 1.5 trillion of RRP and above 10T$ hovering negative yield might juice taper well, but we would need to re-calculate balance runoff and raising rate impact to later adapt market reflexivity.

This effort should reduce inflation pressure which might benefit some selected sectors, like the long waited Biden infrastructure agenda. Supporting my last month article, market participants should support faster taper above market expectation. In my theory, that is bullish for some selected sectors and free up other countries inflation Genny. How about we start with Germany and Japan? Japan has been well known in decades of deflation and Germany driven Europe has been years in severe negative yield. Positive US inflation anode and negative cathode Europe/Japan might be able to drive back global trade account of USD/EURJPY in next 2 years and possible US lead global M&A.

The Indonesian government proclaimed to have inflation to only just 1.68%, much better than any other countries, like US (6%), or even China and Japan, with 10 year bond returning massive 8%. It’s no white t-shirt, but widespread manipulation against inflation formula is just getting too obvious to protect their national security from capital outflow inflation threat. It might be better to run enormous infrastructure incentives like India to grow near to 10%.

It’s quite obvious China takes opposite policies with relentless easing. I think their pain level might be weighted with effort to secure long term infrastructure for resource deals with weaker economies. At same time, China might use this event to soft landing their highly leveraged property and transfer offshore property into local listing where they have more control, rather than allowing foreign hostile take over. Hopefully there’s a possible peace treaty, between the two biggest economies. If they continue to separate, I’m afraid we might see possible widespread of bankruptcy, of not only small companies, but big ones in weaker countries, because their central banks there are not able to juice their market due to inflation.

From above explanation, we may come back to our biggest question, would the US be able to navigate global inflation issue or let others to take advantage of it? This may impact our main investment thesis, whether continue to take higher risk or start moving into safety side. I believe Americans should be very lucky in this environment. Do we see relatively low inflation compared to other countries, never ending increase of their incoming and raising funds, and very high exit to employment indeed?

China admits, US is the envy to the world, might be in attempt to have other countries to fight against the US, or China themselves admitted to feel envy to the US. Unfortunately in this winning situation, money usually seeks higher return possible. If needed, they might destroy other countries (like Turkey). It is double trouble to the victim, from possible hostile take over by enemies and friends, since money rarely does mutualism symbiosis. This inflation might still have longer life, since the US still has enough buffer to future shock, through the use of BBB (Build Back Better), when time is right or maybe when inflation stalls. It may not be the time yet.

Recent check of our last year 3 selected sectors seem still valid:

• Food: never ending increase of fertilizer cost, Xi’an city food shortage, Sri Langka food shortage, from Sydney to Philadephia supermarket food shortage amid CoVid restriction. It may be related to recent global trade crash in BDI (Baltic Dry Index) due to persistent high transport cost and supply chain issue,
• Energy: rally in oil, electricity, natural gas, and other form of energy, like Uranium.
• EV and EV infrastructure: China records low-emission car sales. We also expect bigger deficit this year of base metals related, like nickel, graphite, lithium, copper, aluminium, etc. If these base metals were not able to fulfil demand last year, how about their luck this year with bigger deficit expectation?

Despite our hectic life, it might be wise to put some break at the end of this month, just before another hemisphere of new year embraces their start of roaring year, for the Tiger to restock, reload and re-roar. During this high volatility inflation life, it’s wise to keep our insanity in-check, from destructive over optimism and inflation hype. Hopefully, my thesis about incoming 1-2 years of inflation prosperity comes true.

Disclaimer: Opinion is my own. It’s not financial advise and for research purpose only.

Microorganism is always evolving. Corona virus is like an influenza virus but it’s not like that. It carries new characters. One of few similar characters is they are evolving over time, in which is under a spell of frequency or cycle.

The corona virus is like an influenza virus but not like that.

A possible similar situation is like in 1930s. It could be a reflation but I will argue if it ignites high inflation with their money expansion. I don’t think is because of long easing but simply anything times zero is just zero. This might arguably fit with value vs growth hunting theme/arguments. Negative or near zero rate has failed to perform its inflation targeting. It should be true that market participants have learned and anticipated possibility of recession with monetary polices but unfortunately its number power has gone zero. I like the idea of using yield control targeting but it must come to opposite of monetary policy or long waited fiscal initiatives.

The reflation is like in 1930s but not like that.

Hugh Hendry argued we should instead raise the interest. We know it’s not possible in massive debt. Currently we don’t have any issue with massive debt because the massive debt times zero is also just zero. However we might be able to raise its real interest, like in spread, but still just not like that.

Real rate might increase, but not like that.

The times zero event unleashes a new characteristic of economy theory, that may never be found in any economy literature. Let’s imagine, if money and debt continue going exponential to infinity, is infinity times zero still zero? The answer is false as indicated here but undefined. It will unleash another new characteristic of new economy event. The “undefined” moment will allow more freedom for money to go to whatever it likes. We should start seeing wild gravity of economy theory and mathematics.

I also like the idea that money would need to come to the opposite of its value. The supremacy of USD is being challenged by China rise. Its value depreciation might flow to its opposites like assets but not many countries are able to challenge US. Warren Buffett and Jerome Powell reminded not to challenge America.

The depreciation of USD or any of their peers is like loosing their value but not like that.

I like the idea from Hugh Hendry, other countries will not allow their currency to appreciate and they will do monetary policy (or even better in mixture with fiscal policy). They would increase reserve but at same time buying anything else. Countries will run currency war but it won’t allow their currency to win.

Countries will try to win currency war but not like that.

However I would notice one thing similar. They are all under a curse of time, born, grow and die, a cycle. Time is always an opposite of a period, opposite plays. Anything we do in time zone, should also be seen in frequency zone, in this case is the cycle. Five and 10 year cycles are still looked likely repeating with quite similar sign of their reversal, such as extreme volatility during their rise.

Cycle repeats but not like that.

I would have to argue that assets might run like in year 2005 to 2008 but the zero and negative rate has pushed it to the opposite side.

Assets may rise similar to year 2005-2008 but not like that.

We should also see discrepancy between rich and poor. If we could explain this phenomena, why should we argue high growth of selected shares like FAANG and TESLA? The demand of money opposite should go to not just everything else but very distinct-ed or special assets or equities.

Learning above, I like the idea of being opposite sides. If monetary policies are printing money like no-end, the growth will go to the opposite, asset in value, in a distinctive way.

Opposite works like in a supply and demand theory but not like that.

I’m fond of adaptive theories in which its mathematical frequency characteristic is a base of learning. I think that could explain a “correlation but not like that” event. It can follow market participants without foolishly following just like that.

This is just my own opinion and not in any case of financial advise.